Obama reportedly drew inspiration for his address tonight from three past convention speeches: those of Clinton in 1992, Reagan in 1980, and Kennedy in 1960. As a taste of what may come, here’s JFK, whose words hold truth today:
We know that it will not be easy to campaign against a man who has spoken or voted on every known side of every known issue…And after eight years of drugged and fitful sleep, this nation needs strong, creative Democratic leadership in the White House.
But we are not merely running against Mr. Nixon. Our task is not merely one of itemizing Republican failures. Nor is that wholly necessary. For the families forced from the farm will know how to vote without our telling them. The unemployed miners and textile workers will know how to vote. The old people without medical care – the families without a decent home – the parents of children without adequate food or schools – they all know that it’s time for a change.
But I think the American people expect more from us than cries of indignation and attack. The times are too grave, the challenge too urgent, and the stakes too high – to permit the customary passions of political debate. We are not here to curse the darkness, but to light the candle that can guide us through that darkness to a safe and sane future. As Winston Churchill said on taking office some twenty years ago: if we open a quarrel between the present and the past, we shall be in danger of losing the future.
Today our concern must be with the future. For the world is changing. The old era is ending. The old ways will not do.
Obama’s Latino Outreach Director, Temo Figueora on tomorrow’s speech:
You’re going to be hearing tomorrow from Barack Obama the kick-off of the largest voter registration drive ever in a presidential campaign…he’s going to mention some numbers that we’re going to be spending on voter registration through the month of September that will be mind boggling.
Tinker with turnout models using our interactive spreadsheet, where you can adjust youth and African-American participation in eighteen battleground states. One scenario:
Scenario 2 – 20% Increase Among Blacks and Youth: Shade both Florida and Nevada blue, providing an additional thirty-two electoral votes that boost Obama’s total to 316. Colorado, Virginia, and Missouri – thirty-three electoral votes combined – narrow to within two percent.
Last night’s speeches visualized (click image to enlarge):
No Bush, no Republicans. No taking advantage of an unpopular presidency and a tarnished party. Many are gettingjittery, but the contrasts should shine through in the latter half of the convention — Biden will unload tonight and Obama promised to “make clear the choice that the American people are going to face in November” in his speech Thursday night.
Hillary supporters have not yet flocked to the Democrats’ tent, even though they concur with the party platform. Wary of Obama’s slim resume and perceived aloofness, the group remains a roadblock to victory. In this tact, the Republicans have succeeded: changing the election into a referendum on Obama. But this convention is about undoing that change and shifting the attention to McCain’s record. The indispensable Ambinder notes about the Democratic holdouts:
It is MUCH harder to convince them to vote for Obama because they LIKE him. It is much easier to convince them to vote for Obama because they think McCain represents a continuation of President Bush’s policies. (Obama’s campaign has polling data suggesting that an unusually large number of pro-choice Democrats don’t know that McCain is pro-life.)
In other words, Obama can consolidate the party by turning it against an external foe. And, using this week to unite the party will lead to a sizable and lasting gain in the polls, not some ephemeral convention euphoria.
Let’s delve into some numbers. Obama hovers in the high-seventies among self-described Democrats, although the precise number ranges from poll to poll. In the past four elections, the Democratic nominee has garnered 89-90% of the vote on Election Day; treat that figure as an optimistic ceiling.
Assume Obama comes out of the convention with 85% of the party backing him. The result: a three to four point bounce in the polls. Right now, the RCP average tacks Obama with a narrow 1.6% lead; the convention bounce would widen that gap to a comfortable margin and potentially put the election away.
It’s worth recalling a point Alan Abramowitz made during the tail-end of the primaries:
The fact that Democratic identifiers now decisively outnumber Republican identifiers means that in order to win, Democrats only have to unite and turn out their own base.
Will the Biden pick cause McCain to recalibrate his vice-presidential compass? Mark Halperin previously reported that the Republican nominee had “settled” on Mitt Romney, but Obama’s selection may nudge Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty back into contention.
McCain might want a form of economic ballast to counterweight Biden’s humble background; picking Romney would only widen the wealth chasm between the two tickets. Pawlenty, a man of modest means, advocates Sam’s Club Republicanism, a working-class philosophy much more palatable to Reagan Democrats than Romney’s country-club conservatism.
Romney’s supporters tout his economic fluency, but there’s no evidence that the Bain Capital founder ever connected to voters on bread-and-butter issues. In the Republican primaries, voters who considered the economy the most important issue actually preferred McCain. On the other hand, Pawlenty has a proven ability to empathize with lower-income voters, aided by his blue-collar background.
10:04 PM: Can’t call Biden an elitist: the guy’s the least wealthy senator, with a potentially negative net worth. That background furnishes him with a perfect platform to assail McCain as economically out of touch.
The Tribble Ad Agency wades through domain registrars, concluding that Sebelius will wind up as Obama’s VP pick. Furthermore, the article disqualifies Biden for the position, as ObamaBiden.com is registered to Lyle Dean of San Francisco. According to the agency, “that’s a show stopper… because there is no way that Obama would allow this to happen with the domain name owned by someone else with unknown political views”
Yet in 2004, Kerry picked Edwards even though KerryEdwards.com was already owned by Kerry Edwards, a Hoosier who promptly put the site up for sale. The Democratic campaign didn’t end up owning the domain, declaring the five-figure asking price too steep. Instead, the team stuck with johnkerry.com, a perfectly satisfactory alternative.
Just saying, Biden remains firmly in the running. And in our opinion, he’s the pick.
The straighter a nation’s borders, the less successful the country, according to a working paper (.pdf) by three professors (two from Harvard and one from NYU):
Artificial states are those in which political borders do not coincide with a division of nationalities desired by the people on the ground. We propose and compute for all countries in the world two new measures how artificial states are. One is based on measuring how borders split ethnic groups into two separate adjacent countries. The other one measures how straight land borders are, under the assumption the straight land borders are more likely to be artificial. We then show that these two measures seem to be highly correlated with several measures of economic and political success.
Clearly, Iraq has the bubbling cauldron of three different ethnic groups, but how straight are the country’s borders?
Note the near ruler-precision of the southwestern border. For comparison, take France, a relatively stable nation with squiggly borders all around:
McCain peddles outright lies on national television, including the bogus claim that Obama supports a “tax increase on anyone making more than $42,000 a year.” And he has the gall to say he’s “very sorry” about the campaign’s negative turn.
Posted by Arjun 
Posted by Arjun 
Posted by Arjun 
